Methodology

How the information is established

This site compares retro handhelds. This page explains where the numbers come from, when a piece of information is published, when it is not, and how the site makes money.

The cross-checking rule

Specs start from the manufacturer's official spec sheet, when there is one. A value is displayed ifat least one other source confirms it. When the manufacturer publishes nothing usable,three independent sources must agree exactly. If two other sources agree against the manufacturer, we treat it as an apparent error: the manufacturer's value is set aside and the discrepancy is logged.

Emulation verdicts have no manufacturer source: three independent sources must always reach the same verdict.

If sources contradict each other or are not sufficient, the field stays empty and the page shows “—”. A blank therefore means “not confirmed”, never “missing from the handheld”.

The sources consulted are the manufacturers' spec sheets and public spec databases:

Three sources that agree are not three independent measurements: they may all copy the manufacturer's spec sheet. This is a known limit of the method.

Emulation verdicts

Each system gets one of four verdicts, always with a link to the source used and the verification date.

● perfect
Everything that was tested runs without trouble.
◐ playable
Most games run well, with a few settings to adjust.
◔ limited
Only a few titles run properly; results are uneven.
○ unplayable
The system does not work in any usable way.

Sources use different scales (“Great / Good / Poor”, “Perfect / Great / Playable / Struggles”, compatibility percentages). I convert them to these four levels with a fixed table, and I only keep a verdict when three sources reach the same one. When they diverge, no verdict is published.

Tests written by third parties can count as an additional source, provided the author says they tried that system on that exact device. Capability claims (“the chip handles everything up to Switch”) are not kept.

In-house measurements

When the site measures a handheld itself, the measurement takes precedence over third-party sources: a test done on the device outweighs a copied rating. It is flagged as an “in-house measurement” on the page, with the exact device tested (for example “Thor Pro 12 GB”, which shares its chip with the base Thor). To date there is a single measurement: Switch emulation on the AYN Thor.

The “emulates up to” badge

It is computed, never entered by hand: it is the most demanding system with a confirmed playable orperfect verdict. Because a missing verdict is not a failure, the badge is a reliable minimum: a handheld may do better than what it shows if the sources have not converged yet.

Prices

Prices are collected automatically every day from the official stores of some brands and from European retailers. The site is published from France; what you see depends on the language version:

How results are ranked

Affiliate links and independence

The site is meant to be funded by affiliate links: when you buy after clicking an offer link, the store may pay the site a commission. It does not change the price you pay.

Limits and corrections

The data on this site was last generated on Nov 11, 2026.

Last updated: Nov 11, 2026